May 22, 2012

ESSAY

Shock Poll: 51% of Voters Want US Troops Out of Europe

The Rasmussen polling organization is out with a shock poll that the entire Washington establishment needs to study: 51 percent of voters surveyed said they wanted all US troops out of Europe, now. Only 29 percent favored keeping the troops where they are.

US troops have been in Europe since World War Two. In the Cold War, they not only kept the Russians out; they gave the rest of the Old World the confidence that Germany would not come storming back for a rematch. The presence of US troops helped give western Europe its longest era of peace since Roman times.

Since the end of the Cold War the US presence in Europe has made much less sense to the average American, but foreign policy junkies like yours truly think that it still serves a purpose. Not only do those troops provide security in new NATO countries like Poland and the Baltic republics; US bases in Europe are important in dealing with terror and other problems in the Middle East and without the US presence in Europe it is unlikely that NATO in its present form can survive.

The Rasmussen poll notes that 29 percent of the public still supports the US presence in Europe and that 20 percent is undecided. My guess is that with strong presidential leadership those numbers would change. The arguments for the US presence in Europe are credible, clear and compelling.

Unfortunately the current White House doesn’t like to talk about the pointy end of American foreign policy. It uses troops and sends them into battle around the world, but the President doesn’t often use the bully pulpit to explain why we must fight, why we need a strong military, why we need to deploy, and why sometimes it is cheaper and safer to have our first line of defense thousands of miles from our shores.

My guess is that if President Obama went to leading Democratic and Republican officials, they would join him in an effort to explain the importance of the NATO alliance and our European bases — and that this effort would turn those numbers around.

But foreign policy in a democracy isn’t a chess game for elites. If you don’t build support for your policies and your commitments, the support ebbs away. It is very natural for Americans to wonder why we still have troops in Europe almost seventy years after World War Two and a generation after the end of the Cold War. And it’s reasonable for people to ask why we should spend so much of our money to provide a security shield for countries who refuse to carry their fair share of the common burden.

These are reasonable questions — and they have reasonable answers. But this administration hasn’t done nearly enough to lay out the facts and the ideas behind America’s grand strategy in Europe to the public. (To be fair, the same criticism could be made of its predecessor.) Our national leadership is taking the national commitment to Europe and to NATO for granted, and this is a major mistake.

Americans over a certain age don’t really need to be told why we built NATO and why we are so determined to keep it strong, but every new generation needs to reach its own understanding of the pillars of our foreign policy. Given that many colleges fail to teach much about American foreign policy (beyond, perhaps, some references to the horrors of Vietnam and the dangers of Islamophobia), and that the national leadership is largely silent on the subject of America’s strategy, it’s not surprising that support for our European deployments is weak.

My guess is that while Governor Romney and President Obama differ on some details about our NATO policy, they are in fundamental agreement on the main lines of our European strategy.  It would be nice to hear some of that during this campaign, but whether or not that happens, the Washington establishment needs to stop taking the public for granted. There is a certain arrogance at work here — a belief that public opinion can be ignored for decades and that the peasants will pay taxes and do what they are told without asking questions.

That isn’t how it works anymore, and unless the establishment figures this out, much more than the NATO alliance could be at risk.

No Comments
ESSAY

Boko Haram from the Inside

Boko Haram remains faceless and mysterious to Nigerians, but it does appear to have a strategy and organization, according to an interview with Ahmad Salkida, the Nigerian journalist widely considered to know the group more intimately than almost anyone. In 2005, Salkida began praying at Mohammed Yusuf’s mosque, where Boko Haram originally took shape, was arrested with Yusuf and overheard his execution by police officers, and remains in close contact with the group. Salkida’s neutrality has been questioned by those who think he is too close to Boko Haram, but no one doubts that his information is accurate. What he has to say is very interesting for those of us concerned about Boko Haram’s continued attacks against civilians, the Nigerian government, and Western institutions in Nigeria.

“Boko Haram was founded on ideology, but poor governance was the catalyst for it to spread. If there had been proper governance and a functioning state, Yusuf would have found it very difficult to succeed,” Mr Salkida says…

The recent attacks on Christian churches were designed to provoke retaliation against Muslims, which could drive more people into Boko Haram’s arms, Mr Salkida says. But he rejects the notion that the insurgency is a reaction to having a Christian president, Goodluck Jonathan, or that some northern politicians are involved.

“If there was a Muslim president tomorrow, this would not end. The war is not about individuals, it’s about institutions. Boko Haram sees the northern governors and emirs as part of the institutions.”

Mr Salkida dismisses reports that the group has different factions. Its 30-member ruling council is largely unchanged since 2010, he says, apart from two members arrested by police. “It’s clear they [Boko Haram] are winning the war,” he says. “But I believe Boko Haram wants to end this, just not in a climate of uncertainty and insincerity. Compromises are possible.”

The reports concerning Boko Haram’s organization are particularly disturbing. After Yusuf was executed, Boko Haram went quiet. It has reemerged under Yusuf’s deputy, Abubakar Shekau, but no one was quite sure if he controlled the group as Yusuf once had, or even if Boko Haram could be called a “group” at all. Northern Nigeria is home to thugs, opportunists, and terrorists, and not all of them are affiliated with Boko Haram. Within Boko Haram itself, it wasn’t clear that its leaders all believed in the same strategy, or what kind of forces its leaders even controlled.

Mr. Salkida, with his contacts and knowledge of the group, has shone some light on these important questions: Boko Haram intends to continue its attacks against installations it views as oppressive against northern Nigeria, including those tied to the West. It is not focused solely on attacking Christians; in fact, according to the FT it has killed more Muslims than Christians. This is true of most of these “Islamic” terror movements; far more Muslims have been killed by their attacks than members of any other religion.

Perhaps most disturbing is the news that Boko Haram’s links with al-Qaeda are deepening. Africa is full of local conflicts; al-Qaeda money, experience and ideology can transform small local conflicts into much more serious affairs, and the weakly governed back country of Africa is hard for the forces of order to police and control.

This is not good, and we have not heard the last of Boko Haram.

 

Mr. Salkida might be a reliable source, but his information still shouldn’t be swallowed hook, line, and sinker. His reports paint a picture of Boko Haram as anything but weak and disorganized, yet there appears to be room for the Nigerian government to negotiate a resolution to Boko Haram’s violence and an end to the oppression that begat Boko Haram in the first place.

No Comments
ESSAY

Greek Politics Spreads to Italy

Few in Europe are happy to admit it, but Italy is looking disturbingly similar to Greece these days. Mass youth unemployment, an over-regulated bureaucratic economy and a shaky financial sector have crippled the fiscal health of both countries; both now face a future of austerity and stagnation. And the similarities became even more pronounced late last year, when technocratic governments (charged with implementing European policies) replaced popularly elected leaders in both countries, becoming caretakers until the next election.

For the Greeks, that election was chaotic. The center-right New Democracy party won a victory that wasn’t really a victory, failing to achieve a majority and setting the stage for fringe parties to gain even more in the next election. Greece faces the prospect of divided, fractious government for years to come, and investors are running scared.

Italy now appears poised to follow suit. The FT reports that the major parties of the center-right and the center-left lost seats in recent local elections to representatives of a motley assortment of anti-bailout, anti-Europe parties, ranging from fly-by-night novelty acts to hard leftists:

The local elections indicated that the Democrats, who also support Mr Monti in parliament, would be dependent on a coalition with smaller, more leftwing parties opposed to the technocrats if they are to win next year’s general elections.

This raises the worrying prospect for financial markets of a fractured left-leaning government divided over economic policies. Another possibility is that the weakness of the Democrats and Mr Berlusconi’s centre-right party could drive them in the direction of forming a “grand alliance” that would ask Mr Monti or a similar technocrat figure to take the helm.

Italy is a much bigger potential problem than Greece. If a Greek meltdown merely threatens to wreck the Eurozone and economies of its larger neighbors, an Italian collapse all but guarantees that outcome. Italy’s general elections are not until next year, but if the major parties continue to lose ground to the fringe, there could be some nasty surprises ahead.

No Comments
ESSAY

Mitt, We Hardly Know You

For much of the American public, Mitt Romney remains a cipher. As Via Meadia has noted previously, Romney has too often ceded control of his personal narrative to the press and his opponents, making him particularly vulnerable to countless attacks on his character and to damaging stories like the account of his prep school days. A new Brookings Institution study of the impact of Romney’s Mormonism on the electorate underscores this crucial point. BuzzFeed’s McKay Coppins summarizes:

According to the study, a full 82 percent of respondents said they knew “little” or “nothing” about Mormonism, and researchers found that feeding them even a couple sentences of basic information about the church’s beliefs had the ability to swing wide swaths of the electorate in terms of their support for Romney.

Continue reading

7 Comments
ESSAY

Robot Tutors Could Shake Up Higher Ed

New technologies continue to inject new life into higher education. Online education programs like MITx have been extremely successful in their early runs, inspiring more schools to develop similar programs. While online courses will not displace conventional forms of education, it’s looking increasingly likely that the next generation of college students will graduate with at least a portion of their credits earned online.

The changes are not limited to online education. A new study spanning a number of universitities has shown that in some subjects students using automated teaching software mastered the same material as their peers under the tutelage of professors in a quarter of the time and at a fraction of the cost. Inside Higher Ed has the story (h/t Marginal Revolution).

The robotic software did have disadvantages, the researchers found. For one, students found it duller than listening to a live instructor. Some felt as though they had learned less, even if they scored just as well on tests. Engaging students, such as professors might by sprinkling their lectures with personal anecdotes and entertaining asides, remains one area where humans have the upper hand.

But on straight teaching the machines were judged to be as effective, and more efficient, than their personality-having counterparts.

Unsurprisingly, as Inside Higher Ed notes, repeated studies showing the effectiveness of  automated learning have not convinced professors to drop their opposition to the programs, which are often seen as a threat to their jobs. Yet with tuition costs rising far beyond most people’s ability to pay, colleges need to consider all options. This one certainly seems like a promising start.

No Comments
ESSAY

Will They Come Back?

Egypt has a problem with foreigners. More accurately, Egypt has a problem because there aren’t enough foreigners investing or traveling in Egypt anymore.

After the revolution began last year, foreign investment dried up, fast. Tourists disappeared and haven’t really come back. The two groups—investors and travelers—are extremely important sources of money for the Egyptian government and the entire economy itself. With elections this week, investors are waiting to see what kind of government begins to take shape in Cairo. All presidential candidates have said they favor free market-focused economic policies, and all of them understand the importance of foreign investors and tourists to the Egyptian economy.

To illustrate just how important, here’s the FT:

Investment plunged after the revolution early last year, with businesses taking $482m out of the country in 2011, a dizzying drop from the $6.4bn of inflows it saw in 2010. There are no figures for 2012, but analysts say investment remains on hold as foreign companies wait to see the results of the presidential poll.

“They need to see what will be the tax rate, energy prices and labour laws,” Mr Kitchen said. “Also for the first time arguably we will have a fragmented political system. So how will parliament deal with the president? Will they disagree over cutting energy subsidies, privatisation and salaries? All these questions are up in the air.”

It’s not just foreign investors who have moved money out of Egypt. The Coptic minority and Egyptian businesses with links to the old regime have also seen the wisdom of stashing their money overseas until things settle down in Cairo.

Whatever new government the Egyptians elect will have to make some important decisions fast.  Will European tourists be able to go topless at Egyptian resorts while swilling alcoholic cocktails? Will businesses linked to the ancien regime get some kind of amnesty? Will a business friendly tax and regulation system tell foreigners that the welcome mat is out? Will the Coptic minority be made to feel secure? Will relations with Israel be calm enough so that foreigners won’t worry about the prospect of war? What kind of relationship will the new Egyptian leaders carve out with the Gulf Arabs, in whose oil rich countries many Egyptian expats work and from whose coffers come much of the investment and aid that Egypt needs to get back on its feet?

There are some signs that Egyptian public opinion is moving in a more pragmatic direction as the election approaches, but the signals are hard to read. Whoever the Egyptians vote in, and however the various factions and parties in the new power structure sort out their roles and responsibilities, the tight economic and political constraints within which Egypt will move lay out a challenging agenda and a difficult path.

It isn’t easy to rule a country with an exploding population, rising expectations, low skills, and few resources—all in the midst of a global economic slowdown.

4 Comments

May 21, 2012

ESSAY

Saber-Rattling in Syria: Opposition Denounces Israel

Here’s another reminder that the uprisings of the Arab Spring are a lot messier and more complicated than the optimists want you to believe: The Syrian opposition today issued a stinging riposte against its implacable foe…Israel. Reports YNet:

Leader of the Syrian opposition bloc Burhan Ghalioun said Saturday that the Syrian regime signed an agreement with Israel, which he called “the main enemy of the Syrian revolution.”

In an interview with Saudi newspaper al Youm, Ghalioun negated the possibility of normalizing relations with Israel, if and when President Bashar Assad’s regime falls.

“We are convinced that the Syrian regime’s strongest ally is Israel,” he told the paper, adding that the international community’s lack of action in Syria stems from concerns for the Jewish State’s safety.

The biggest fear people have about Syria is that prolonged conflict will not only kill tens of thousands of innocent people; it will also empower armed fanatics and could trigger a much wider war. The strongest (interest based and non-humanitarian) argument for outside intervention is that waiting only gives the darker forces more of a chance to arm themselves and control the future of the country; to some degree, we are too late.

Right now the conflict is moving faster than diplomacy; unless that changes this war is on course to get worse in every possible way.

4 Comments
ESSAY

France Most Threatened by Greek Euro Exit

Greece’s exit from the Euro is looking more likely by the day, and increasing numbers of analysts now believe that that may be the best way forward—at least for the Greeks, if not the rest of Europe. Many countries stand to lose significant investments should Greece bail on the common currency.

A new piece in French daily Les Echos argues that France may have more to lose than any other European nation. This is partially due to its exposure to Greek debt. France currently holds nearly 65 billion euros in Greek debt, on top of a further 37 billion euros held by French companies. If Greece departs the euro and defaults on its debts, French losses could exceed 100 billion euros.

And this doesn’t take into account France’s exports to Greece or French investments in the country, which are valued at more than three billion euros. France retains a large trade surplus with Greece amounting to 1.87 billion Euros.

These figures help explain why President Hollande wants so badly to forestall a Greek exit from the euro. Bailouts may cost Europe a fortune, but the costs of letting Greece go could be far worse — and, from the French point of view, there’s another advantage. Germany will pay more money in to any new efforts to save Greece, but the benefits will flow disproportionately to France. Using German money to support French economic interests is exactly what many French politicians think the EU should be doing; Charles de Gaulle would be pleased.

2 Comments
ESSAY

Unions Prepare for Fall in Wisconsin

We’ve been following the race in the Wisconsin effort to recall Governor Scott Walker because in our view this is the most important election in America before the Big One in November.

We still hold to that belief, but this thing is looking less like a race and more like a coronation. With only two weeks left before the election, popular betting site Intrade gives Walker a 90 percent chance of winning—up about 25 points from his showing last week.

Driving those Intrade numbers is a series of polls showing Walker with a steady and even growing lead. Beyond the raw numbers, Walker’s supporters seem to be even more energized than his Democratic supporters. There’s still time for Walker to make some kind of career-destroying gaffe or for some other unpredictable event to throw the race into chaos, but so far the momentum is all going his way.

Republicans and blue dog Democrats all over the country will scrutinize the election returns with great care. If Walker holds on, look for more attacks on public union bargaining rights in other cash strapped states. Labor put everything it had into this one; if it comes up short the political landscape will have changed.

13 Comments
ESSAY

Bank Runs Speed Up European Decision Making

Together with the election of François Hollande in France, a European bank walk (more and more depositors moving money out of the banking systems of countries they think might be at risk of leaving the euro) is steering Europe toward a new set of policies. As the Financial Times details, Germany in particular is being forced to reconsider ideas they had previously declared non-starters:

The proposals, which could include empowering the eurozone’s €500bn rescue fund to directly recapitalise faltering European banks and commonly backed eurozone bonds, have been backed by some leaders in the past but forced off the agenda by the German chancellor’s objections.

Since the beginning of 2010, deposits in Greek banks have fallen by about a third, and the pace of withdrawal has accelerated sharply in recent days: on a single day last week Greek depositors withdrew €700 million. Meanwhile, deposits in Irish and Spanish banks have also been falling. In Spain, rumors of a bank run led to a fall of 30 percent in the value of Spanish bank shares. The banks recovered their value the next day, but the episode illustrated the alarming speed with which a modern bank panic can unfold.

That’s the thing about bank runs: They can go viral. The more you hear about other people taking their money out of the bank, the more you think you ought to do the same thing. When this snowballs, you have a true panic. It’s the kind of disaster that can wipe out big banks overnight, throw weak governments over the edge, and generally wreak havoc on the European and even world economy. No wonder European policymakers are scrambling for yet another set of contingency plans.

5 Comments
ESSAY

Is Competition Really Killing Higher Ed?

In a recent piece at Bloomberg, Mark C. Taylor makes a provocative argument that cuts against the grain of the usual thinking about college reform: Competition is killing higher education, he says.

This is certainly a controversial position, but Taylor has amassed considerable evidence for his conclusion. An atmosphere of intense competition for new applicants, he argues, is accelerating three of the main issues bankrupting colleges today: excessive building construction, unhealthy obsession with school rankings, and the proliferation of unnecessary degree programs. The construction boom is particularly problematic. As well-endowed private schools construct lavish new facilities, smaller, less wealthy schools over-leverage themselves to keep up, lest they fail to attract top students. The resulting “construction arms race” has spawned billions of dollars in unnecessary costs, pushing many universities to the brink of bankruptcy—and pushing tuition bills into the stratosphere.

But the proliferation of new degree programs is an even worse problem, says Taylor:

Second- and third-tier universities often create unneeded doctoral programs to become eligible for additional federal support and to increase their global profile. For example, the University of North Texas has 36,000 students and advertises itself as “a student-focused public research university” offering “97 bachelor’s, 82 master’s and 35 doctoral degree programs.”

Even this is not enough. Although severe budget shortfalls have led to cuts of as much as 90 percent for some programs, the university is adding new doctoral programs in a quest for the elusive top-tier status. This makes no educational sense and violates basic market principles. If successful, the University of North Texas will join too many other schools that are spending large amounts for unneeded programs that turn out products—doctoral graduates—for which the supply far outweighs the demand. This is a national issue, as pointed out in an article this month in the Chronicle of Higher Education titled “The Ph.D. Now Comes With Food Stamps.”

Read the whole thing.

We should take the issues Taylor raises seriously; certain kinds of competition are indeed problematic. But that doesn’t mean that all forms of competition are problematic. The problem with modern universities is that they are aiming to compete on everything except the core issues of price and educational quality, focusing instead on areas that are tangential to their core mission. Quality facilities and high rankings in international surveys are nice (especially because they’ll bring in lots of students and their government-subsidized loans and grants). But if they widen the already sizable gap between the cost of a degree and its value to prospective employers, then they are getting in the way of an important part of a university’s core mission.

Rather than touting their pristine facilities and small class sizes, colleges should be boasting that they offer the best education at the lowest price. This is the competition we need.

15 Comments
ESSAY

Syria’s Violence Spreads to Beirut

First Tripoli, now Beirut. Next, Hezbollah?

From the NYT:

Gun battles between Lebanese factions supporting and opposing the government of President Bashar al-Assad spread to Beirut on Monday in the most serious outbreak of violence in Lebanon since the Syrian uprising began, leaving several people dead and the country more tense than ever in its effort to avoid the fray next door.

The fighting overnight in Beirut resulted in the expulsion of a small pro-Syrian faction, the Arab Movement Party, from a largely Sunni Muslim neighborhood in the southern part of the city. The quarter’s streets were littered with burned cars and trash containers, but mostly calm after the military intervened.

Hezbollah, according to reports, has yet to become involved in the fighting in Lebanon. If that happens, Lebanon might witness a kind of sectarian and religious violence not seen in years. Already, several Gulf states have warned their citizens to avoid travel to Lebanon and have advised those still in Lebanon to try to leave.

These are not good signs for one of the Middle East’s most explosive countries.

1 Comment
ESSAY

Fasten Your Seatbelts: Tajik-Pak Flights Take Off as Indo-Pak Rivalry Heats Up

For all the talk of globalization, until quite recently the world still looked quite round from most Central Asian airports. Many capital cities in Central Asia, like Tashkent, Bishkek, or Dushanbe offered primarily flights to Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other Russian cities popular for the hundreds of thousands of labor migrants that go north to work every year: Omsk, Novosibirsk, Khabarovsk, or Ekaterinburg. Until the emergence of carriers like Turkish Airlines or China Southern into the Central Asian travel market, making your way along the Silk Road via the air was hard. In more recent years, well-funded local carriers like Air Astana of Kazakhstan have connected with country with exotic destinations like Beijing, Bangkok, Delhi, and Abu Dhabi, and even Turkmenistan Airlines offers a Birmingham-Ashgabat-Amritsar route for the more adventurous. The emergence of such new routes traces the outlines of the new Central Asia emerging as part of the larger Game of Thrones Via Meadia is tracking. Continue reading

2 Comments
ESSAY

Kickstarting the Jobs of the Future

One of the story threads we like to keep an eye on here at Via Meadia is loosely called “jobs of the future”. It’s a way to look at the shape of the new economy struggling to emerge from the disintegrating remains of the blue social model, and it’s a focus that we think can help readers, especially younger readers, imagine their way to a new and better life.

The same force that is killing so many old jobs and old companies is giving life to new ones: the secret to American prosperity is for us individually and collectively to learn how to surf the wave of change rather than letting it break over us and pull us out to sea. So at Via Meadia, which itself is an example of people building new jobs and new organizations as the world of print journalism breaks up, we keep an eye on these trends and we’ve highlighted several examples of entrepreneurs leveraging technology in innovative and clever ways to nimbly provide products and services which uniquely meet modern needs and were simply not possible before.

One of the most promising intersections of entrepreneurship and technology that’s crossed our path is a venture known as Kickstarter. The concept is simple: an entrepreneur comes up with an idea, sets the goal amount of money they’d like to raise, makes a video pitching the project to prospective investors/supporters, sets up tiers of support (different levels of funding that prospective supporters can sign up for, and the corresponding rewards), and… that’s it. If approved by Kickstarter’s staff, Kickstarter hosts the project’s page, handles the collection of the money (while taking a 5% cut), and serves as a sort of clearing house for neat small ideas in search of funding. The service works on an all-or-nothing model—if the project doesn’t reach its specified funding goal within the allotted timeframe, no one’s credit cards are charged. If the funding goal is reached, the charges are made, Kickstarter creams off its cut, and the entrepreneurs have their funding.

Think of it as venture capitalism for the little guy — and think of it also as one of the ways that more effective use of IT is empowering individuals and small firms and accelerating the pace of change.

Kickstarter has been around has been around since 2009, an eon in internet time, and it has already earned the kind of knee-jerk contrarian backlash with which success is often greeted on the Internet. But until very recently is was floundering, and it hadn’t quite managed to raise the kind of seed money that venture capital usually provides. Since early February of this year, Kickstarter has funded nine projects which have raised more than $1 million each, with the latest success story, the Pebble watch, whose video we’ve embedded above, raising an eye-popping $10 million last Friday.

Faster, leaner, more flexible and opportunistic: this is what much of the future looks like. Will the Pebble watch catch on? Via Meadia has no idea. Will Kickstarter grow into a huge juggernaut and develop new ways to supplement traditional venture capital funding at higher levels? Again, we do not know.

But ideas like this are out there, people are building them, and somewhere in there are the Facebooks and the Apples and the Intels of the future. If America is going to have a successful and prosperous 21st century built on mass prosperity, a strong middle class and a productive economy, it will be people like those behind Kickstarter and its clients who will make it happen.

7 Comments

May 20, 2012

ESSAY

Week in Review

Remember when Occupy Wall Street was sweeping the nation? How the mighty have fallen. We marveled at OWS’s spectacular fizzle this spring as it threatened reassert itself with the advent of more propitious weather for street demonstrations. But though Occupy is a bust, we speculated that we may yet see a real left-populist movement emerge in America if Romney and the Republicans win big this fall.

As a series of omens appeared on the occasion of Francois Hollande assuming France’s presidency, we tracked the slow-motion collapse of the European banking sector, and gamed out what the less-talked-about geopolitical ramifications of the exit of Greece (and Cyprus) from the EU would be for countries like Israel and Russia.

Move over, BRICs, there’s a new acronym in town. The GUTS (Germany, the United States, Turkey and South Korea) may be the true rising powers of the 21st century. Even Ezra Klein agrees that the picture for the United States is much rosier than most predict. Meanwhile, Brazil reported some fairly lackluster growth figures, causing market analysts to downgrade its prospects going forward. India looks more and more like the “Greece of Asia“. Fissures in the Chinese system grow more prominent by the day, making some sort of crisis there likely. And Russia continues to be Russia, pointlessly issuing a veiled nuclear threat against the United States, thus undermining its own stock market.

Of the foundering BRICs, though, China remains the most formidable power. Though American efforts in the broader region continue to pay off—best exemplified this week by the dramatic realignment of Burma against North Korea—America’s ability to directly influence events inside China itself remain vanishingly small. And the pivot itself is not some mere matter of shifting focus and calling it a day. On the contrary, there are many complications and pitfalls which can beset the strategy if it’s not competently executed. Via Meadia looks forward to the ongoing national dialogue about this subject going forward.

Though things look good in the macro sense, there are plenty of challenges ahead for the United States as it refashions itself for the 21st century. California’s steady march towards failed statehood is proceeding apace as Governor Jerry Brown announced that the budget shortfall would be $16 billion instead of $9 billion, despite some difficult dear-to-blue cuts he had tried to make. The blue civil war intensified in Illinois, as the state’s unions pushed back hard against Governor Pat Quinn’s efforts to rein in pension costs (which are increasingly a problem in Scotland too). The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers in Kansas came under scrutiny for some potentially criminal shenanigans in managing their pension fund. And several states have taken a much-needed $25 billion settlement earmarked for foreclosure prevention and have chosen to use the funds to plug other budget holes in higher education, prisons, and energy instead.

1 Comment