January 27, 2012

ESSAY

Thank God For Humanitarian Bombs?

Each day that goes by gives the White House more reason to regret its Libyan adventure. The overthrow of Gaddafi was a good thing, but from both the humanitarian and strategic points of view, nothing has changed. The war continues to look at best like a diversion, at worst as if the US fell for a cynical French ploy to get oil in a way that damaged our long term strategic interests.

Continue reading

5 Comments
ESSAY

New Iran Crisis Wrinkle: Who’s Bluffing Whom?

Yesterday, the Iranians threatened to call what they hope is Europe’s bluff.  Today, Israel is musing out loud whether it is Iran that is bluffing.

The EU recently announced plans to embargo oil shipments (starting in six months) while admitting that, due to Greek and Italian dependence on Iranian supplies, the boycott can’t start immediately.  Iran thinks the whole thing could be a bluff, and its Parliament wants to cut Europe off immediately by imposing an Iranian ban on shipping oil to Europe, effective now.

The Israelis, meanwhile, are arguing over whether Iran’s threats of massive retaliation in the event of an Israeli attack on Iran are a bluff.  As the New York Times reports,

“A war is no picnic,” Defense Minister Ehud Barak told Israel Radio in November. But if Israel feels itself forced into action, the retaliation would be bearable, he said. “There will not be 100,000 dead or 10,000 dead or 1,000 dead. The state of Israel will not be destroyed.”

Some analysts also think Iran’s threats of setting off regional wars and chaos are also overblown.  Hamas appears to be drifting out of Iran’s orbit, Hezbollah is worried by the threat to its Syrian patrons, and Shiite Iran’s ability to win support from Sunni radicals at a time of religious polarization in the Middle East may not be that high.

There are still others who think Israel’s threats to attack Iran are a bluff intended to push Europe into tougher action and to force Washington to take a stronger stand.

It’s too soon to tell how things will shake out in the struggle over the Iranian bomb program, but by the time this is done, some of these players are going to have their bluffs called.

No Comments
ESSAY

How Thick is Your Bubble?

In his forthcoming book, Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010, Charles Murray argues that

A new upper class that makes decisions affecting the lives of everyone else but increasingly doesn’t know much about how everybody else lives is vulnerable to making mistakes.

…As the new upper class increasingly consists of people who were born into upper-middle-class families and have never lived outside the upper-middle-class bubble, the danger increases that the people who have so much influence on the course of the nation have little direct experience with the lives of ordinary Americans, and make their judgments about what’s good for other people based on their own highly atypical lives.

To prove his point, Murray offers a 25-question quiz designed to test an individual’s distance from the life of the average American. “Have you ever lived for at least a year in an American neighborhood in which the majority of your fifty nearest neighbors probably did not have college degrees?” “Have you ever held a job that caused something to hurt at the end of the day?” “Have you ever had a close friend who was an evangelical Christian?” “Have you ever watched an Oprah, Dr. Phil, or Judge Judy show all the way through?”

Take the quiz. Harvard students in particular, well versed as they no doubt are in the arcana of anti-colonial troll studies, might find that improving their scores on this quiz was a way to make themselves more useful and influential citizens of the United States.

10 Comments
ESSAY

Trend #10: Hope and Change

In many respects, this year’s list of ten trends paints a chaotic picture of the next decade: exacerbating economic upheaval, religious conflict and mass proliferation of weapons hardly constitute a reassuring forecast for the coming years. Fortunately, the list will once again end on a high note; for all the hand-wringing about the obstacles to come, there is even more reason for optimism.

When Via Meadia first tackled our tenth trend, “Hope and Change,” we wrote the following:

The flood of change that threatens to overturn the world in the next decade is the instability of a rising tide, not a falling one.  New discoveries, new technologies, new ideas are going to transform the lives of billions of people.  More people than ever before will have access to information about the world around them and will be able to participate in the cultural and political life of their times.  Humanity will be able to provide for its physical needs at a lower cost and with lower impact on the environment.  Increasing numbers of people all around the world will escape the limits of absolute poverty and enjoy unprecedented opportunities to build better lives for themselves and their children.

This description is more apt today than when first written. The past two years alone have produced countless reasons to expect that humanity’s future will be brighter and more prosperous than its past, and there is no sign of this trend slowing anytime soon. New systems, technologies, and economic ideas are arriving faster than ever before, and with them come new opportunities to make the world a better place.

Everywhere we look, new opportunities are springing up, even from chaotic and disruptive situations. Nowhere is this more visible than in the field of education, where an ossified system with growing costs, declining results, and stifling bureaucracy is slowly giving way to a new system in which online programs and practical training programs provide more extensive and affordable education. The transition has only just begun, and there will be many painful years as students and teachers alike adjust to a rapidly changing educational system. But the end result will be a modernized education system that suits the needs of a new century in ways the current one simply cannot.

The benefits of new technology are not limited to education. The disaggregation brought about by the internet may have wreaked havoc on travel agents and newspapers, but it has opened the door to new industries that will serve the needs of a more dynamic market. These are the “jobs of the future” that will keep our economy running, and they will allow more people than ever before to abandon menial labor for more fulfilling careers elsewhere.

Even in the field of energy, there is reason for hope. Despite widespread predictions that declining world oil reserves will lead to an era of expensive energy and intense geopolitical conflict, new (and controversial) methods like “fracking” to extract natural gas promise to keep prices down while reducing the danger of military conflict. More discoveries like these will world’s factories humming long past their predicted demise.

And these opportunities are not limited to the West. Beijing may worry that rising wages for Chinese workers threaten its position as the world’s low-cost factory, but hundreds of millions of Chinese workers are unlikely to share this anxiety. Similarly, the urbanization and industrialization of Asia and Africa are disruptive forces, but have allowed families who had for generations depended on subsistence farming to find new, more stimulating opportunities in a broader world.

Changes in the past two years have given us ample reason for hope, with plenty of headaches as well. There’s no reason that should change in the next ten.

1 Comment

January 26, 2012

ESSAY

Anti-Colonial Troll Studies At Harvard

Is there something wrong with the Boston-Cambridge water supply? Via Meadia has written previously about the plague of so-called “awesome” courses in the academies that nestle along the banks of the Charles. To understand the failures of our higher educational system, one need look no further than college classes on topics ranging from “Puppetry” to “Surfing and American Culture” which provide little educational value, no marketable skills, and essentially serve to defraud irresponsible college students (and their parents) out of tuition money and student loans.

Add Harvard to the list of institutions promoting the proliferation of such nonsense, as evidenced by its Spring offerings. Now, most entries in the Crimson course catalog are what one would expect from America’s most fabled university. But alongside respectable intellectual offerings one finds such gems as:

Scandinavian 102: Trolls, Trolldom and the Uses of Tradition
Examines Scandinavian folklore and folk life, with an emphasis on narratives, supernatural beliefs, and material culture from the 17th to the early 20th centuries, and the anti-colonial and nation-building uses of these traditions.

Visual and Environmental Studies 80: Loitering: Studio Course
You will hang out in the vicinity of culture and make things in response to it. This class is not thematic or linked to any particular discipline.
Note: No previous studio experience necessary.

Sign us up for the anti-colonial troll studies class, please.  Though we have some qualms; the word ‘troll’ is redolent of lookism and many other forms of hate speech. We have half a mind to rat Harvard out to the National Committee for the Protection of Forest Persons.

19 Comments
ESSAY

The Great Game: Philippine Edition

The Obama Administration may soon come to an agreement with Philippines to station U.S. troops or naval vessels on its territory. The talks are still in the early stages, but officials from both countries have said they are inclined to strike a deal within the next few months.

An agreement with Manila would come close on the heels of two other upcoming moves: American Marines soon to be stationed in Australia and several U.S. warships moving to Changi Naval Base in Singapore.

Asian nations are learning that the United States is prepared to offer a real balance against China’s new assertiveness in the region. In the Philippine case, this dovetails nicely with the country’s interests—especially with respect to the disputed Spratly and Paracel islands, geographically closer to the Philippines than China. Manila has occasionally stationed troops on the islands, and it operates a number of offshore oil fields in waters claimed by China. Having American ships docked in its ports, if not also American boots on Philippine soil, will no doubt be a confidence booster for Manila in these and other disputes.

8 Comments
ESSAY

Churchill And Mead Agree: Fake Meat Will Save The World

Winston Churchill understood Gaia better than most greens.

Seventy years ago, Churchill made a prediction: “We shall escape the absurdity of growing a whole chicken in order to eat the breast or wing, by growing these parts separately under a suitable medium.” (h/t The Guardian) Via Meadia couldn’t agree more. Not only will fake meat cut down on the animal killing that so upsets PETA, it will also cut down on the carbon emissions associated with large-scale animal farming. While the environmental benefits have been clear for some time, a recent article in The Guardian makes clear just how serious they are:

Inspired by the “numbers, not adjectives” principle, we contributed to the assessment of the environmental impacts of cultured meat production and have published our findings in a peer-review journal. The results showed that cultured meat has 80-95% lower greenhouse gas emissions, 99% lower land use and 80-90% lower water use compared to conventionally produced meat in Europe.

Every kilo of conventionally produced meat requires 4kg-10kg of feed, whereas cultured meat significantly increases efficiency by using only 2kg of feed. Based on our results, if cultured meat constituted half of all meat consumed we could halve the greenhouse emissions, and increase the forest cover by 50%, which is equivalent to four times of Brazil’s current forest area.

The environmental benefits of cultured meat are even greater when the costs of land use are taken into account. Strategies for carbon sequestration could be used on the land freed from meat agriculture and would include growing new forests. There’d also be an increase in biodiversity as more land could be used for wildlife conservation.

Some readers, it is clear from the comment section, are appalled by the thought of ‘cultured meat’ as the Guardian so delicately puts it.  Here at the stately Mead manor we have an open mind, possibly because an early exposure to British school food inured us to odd meat. With enough ketchup, Shamburgers™ will satisfy the most demanding palate, and Faux-Fowl™ will, we are sure, taste exactly like chicken.

But the green movement needs to jump on this bandwagon fast.  The chances that global carbon emissions will be reduced by the mass adoption of cultured meat are at least ten million times greater than the chances that those emissions will be capped by a grand global treaty.

8 Comments
ESSAY

Obama Fracks, Greens Sulk

Greens widely hailed President Obama’s decision to block the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, but was that move just setting up a pivot toward brown? Following his State of the Union address, the President announced plans to increase demand for natural gas by supporting infrastructure that makes use of it, as well as by opening up millions of acres of offshore real estate to new drilling. This policy could yield several political benefits. For starters, green industry has yet to become the job-creating dynamo Obama promised; brown jobs, meanwhile, are there for the taking. Even better, America’s expanding  production and vast reserves of shale gas mean less reliance on foreign sources of energy.  Natural gas is also both greener and cheaper than oil at current prices. Cheap, greener, and locally produced: What’s not to love?

Plenty, say the implacable greens. Despite all the upsides, they have criticized the plan, citing the fact that more and more American natural gas is produced via fracking and offshore drilling, two of their greatest bugbears.  A little gratitude for the President’s politically risky call on the Keystone decision would seem to be in order, but that is not how the green lobby works. Yes, yes, they say, we know you fell on your sword for us over Keystone, but what have you done for us lately?

The President could use some nicer friends.

6 Comments
ESSAY

Turkey: Islamist Nightmare or Misunderstood Friend?

Four days before he dropped out of the Republican race, Governor Rick Perry created an uproar by saying that Turkey is “being ruled by what many would perceive to be Islamic terrorists,” suggesting it was time to reevaluate Turkey’s place in NATO and to consider zeroing-out US aid to the country.

There was, of course, a huge media uproar in Turkey over these comments, but after the first shock wore off, something of a debate has erupted among Turkish and American commentators regarding the state of relations between the two countries.

Major Turkish newspapers described the incident as “scandalous,” with distinguished columnists like Mustafa Akyol opining “Rick Perry: What an Idiot.”

Continue reading

15 Comments
ESSAY

Fukuyama to Hungary: Watch Out

Francis Fukuyama’s blog continues to make waves, this time with a skillful dissection of just what has gone wrong in Hungary. Writes Frank:

The problem lies entirely in how those powers are used: nobody trusts Viktor Orbán and Fideusz to use their powers responsibly, as evidenced in the way that the government rammed the constitution itself through the Diet last year, with little willingness to give ground on issues of grave concern to important parts of Hungarian society. Orbán’s behavior betrays an authoritarian thin skin that would rather ban opposition than engage with it.

Judging from our traffic stats, the essay is getting a lot of attention in Hungary; read the whole thing.

5 Comments
ESSAY

Cuba: The Next Petrostate?

Cuba has been searching for oil for years; improving technology means its chances are better than ever, and a new exploratory rig offers the island nation its best hope for good economic news since communism began to eat away at the island’s hopes back in the Eisenhower administration.

Oil didn’t save communism in the Soviet Union, and it won’t save communism in the Caribbean. (I remember back in the 1980s hearing the joke in Moscow: What would happen if the Soviet Union conquered the Sahara Desert.  Answer:  Nothing for fifty years, and then a shortage of sand. Revolutionary Cuba managed to achieve shortages of sugar even faster than that.)

The foreign companies now drilling for oil and basking in the government’s favor are likely to discover what many other foreign companies in Cuba have found: that their biggest problem isn’t the US embargo, but the changing policies of a Cuban government that remains deeply suspicious of all ‘imperialists’ and ‘capitalist exploiters’.

Used wisely, an oil find could enable Cuba to make a smooth transition back to a more sustainable economic model and a less oppressive political system. Unfortunately, some of the dinosaurs in the Cuban ruling establishment will argue that the oil wealth should go to prop up the old methods up a little longer.  At least one of those dinosaurs is named Castro.

Cuba’s potential wealth lies in the creativity of its people and their intense hunger for a better life.  Its tragedy is that the government tries to crush that creativity and frustrate that hunger. This is a problem that oil can’t fix.

US policy toward Cuba is absurd, but Cuba’s policy toward Cuba is much worse.

1 Comment
ESSAY

Trend #9: The European Crack Up

Back at the start of the decade, Via Meadia predicted that “[t]he end of the Cold War combined with the rise of Asia will introduce the world to a new kind of reality: a post-European world order.” The past year has moved the world a long way down this path. The United States spent the year looking westward across the Pacific, and the State Department had a busy year not working in Europe. Instead, America opened a new base in Australia, announced plans to further integrate military operations with the Philippines and took steps toward mending relations with Myanmar. When pundits talk about the “special relationship” later this century, they may be talking about the U.S.-Australian alliance rather than the close historical association with Great Britain. Likewise, by 2050 the region formerly known as French Indochina might conceivably be more important to the United States than France itself.

Europe may be trying to get on the Asian bandwagon too. Der Spiegel fantasized about a post-American world in which China formed an alliance with the European Union based on “green” technologies; given the track record for green dreams becoming reality, we won’t be holding our breath. After all, when Europe came to China looking for bailout, hat in hand, it got nothing more than a disappointing snub.

Over the past year, however, the European Union’s own problems had as much to do with Europe’s decline as the rise of Asia. The financial crises in the PIIGS worsened as France and Germany, the pushmi-pullyu leading Europe’s train, took the continent precisely nowhere. 

Europe’s sovereign debt crisis was all over the news back in 2010, but 2011 was the year we learned just how deep and intractable the core problems were. The real crisis in Europe was not financial but cultural. Whatever the future holds, Club Med is as likely to join the Fourth Reich as Germany is to get a Club Med Membership Card.

European policy makers and opinion leaders spent the last decade discussing the decline of the United States, only to realize with a shock that Europe’s own problems threatened to relegate Europe to the world’s second division. A continent that began the new century discussing the post-American world spent 2011 nervously wondering if the US and China were about to set up a G-2.

Europe is not yet a cipher; even with its economic and political problems it remains the world’s largest market and, potentially, a powerful force. Its wealth, its technological skill, its rich cultural heritage and its institutional foundations remain the envy of much of the world. In the Mediterranean, as the Great Loon of Libya discovered too late, Europe still counts for something — when the Americans give their OK. But in Africa, Asia and Latin America, Europe’s economic and political imprint continues to fade.

Technically, it’s still possible to see how Europe could turn itself around.  If it accepted the need for sweeping economic reforms, split the euro into two currency zones, doubled its defense spending, figured out how to assimilate immigrants, brought Turkey into the EU and started making more babies, the world would soon start talking about Europe’s revival.

Sadly, none of this is likely to happen, and our ninth global trend for the decade is likely to be with us for some time to come.

8 Comments
ESSAY

The Great Brain Robbery

Last month, Via Meadia reviewed a recent study about the quality of academic research and came to a disappointing conclusion: Much of the research produced by academics isn’t very good. A recent article in The Atlantic adds a new wrinkle: Not only is the quality of this research quite poor, universities are spending a fortune to view it. According to the Atlantic, professors and academic journals create the content for free, but then universities are forced to pay to view the content they create. The article puts it best:

Having bought the rights to the academic research, JSTOR digitizes the material and sells the content back to the university libraries. To recoup their costs of leasing the information from the publishers, the academic search engines use a subscription model to restrict the content to those who can pay the hefty price tag. A substantial part of the university library budget is devoted towards subscriptions to those databases. The UC San Diego Libraries report that 65% of their total budget goes towards getting access to JSTOR and other databases. To get access to the Arts and Sciences collection at JSTOR — only one of the many databases and collections of information — university libraries must pay a one time charge of $45,000 and then $8,500 every year after that.

Step back and think about this picture. Universities that created this academic content for free must pay to read it. Step back even further. The public — which has indirectly funded this research with federal and state taxes that support our higher education system — has virtually no access to this material, since neighborhood libraries cannot afford to pay those subscription costs. Newspapers and think tanks, which could help extend research into the public sphere, are denied free access to the material. Faculty members are rightly bitter that their years of work reaches an audience of a handful, while every year, 150 million attempts to read JSTOR content are denied every year.

The last bit rang a little false to us; faculty members who want the results of their research to reach a broader public have plenty of opportunities to write op-eds, reports for think tanks or even, for those lost to all sense of propriety, blog posts.  Nevertheless, an essential aspect of a university’s mission is to make knowledge as widely available as possible; perhaps a consortium of leading universities could find ways to force JSTOR and others to adopt a business model more in keeping with the nature of academic ideals.

There are reports that JSTOR is looking at alternative delivery models; much more remains to be done.

5 Comments

January 25, 2012

ESSAY

CS Lewis Rejected Royal Honor

CS Lewis, who with his Oxford colleague JRR Tolkien, ranks with Ian Fleming, Agatha Christie and Arthur Conan Doyle as among the best known 20th century British authors among Americans, turned both Winston Churchill and the Queen down flat, newly released British documents show.

The Order of the British Empire was established by George V originally to honor Britons who contributed to the country’s victory in World War Two. The awards come in five grades, from the highest (Knight or Dame Grand Cross) down to the lowest rank of Member.  The top two tiers offer knighthoods or their female equivalent; Americans and other non-Brits are eligible for honorary memberships but don’t get to call themselves “Sir”.  (Becoming an actual knight involves swearing allegiance to the current king or queen, something we Americans swore off a long time ago.)

The awards are made by the monarch on the recommendation of the government of the day. Lewis was offered the highest non-knightly grade; had he accepted he would have been known as CS Lewis, CBE.

The documents don’t give reasons for the turn down, but a number of other literary and cultural figures over the years also declined: John Lennon accepted, but returned his to protest Britain’s pro-Nigeria stance during the Biafran war.

In keeping with custom, Lewis never revealed that he had rejected the honor, and presumably would not want this known even now. [UPDATE: As reader Will Vaus points out (see comment below), after Lewis' death, his brother included in a collection of Lewis' correspondence the letter Lewis wrote graciously declining the honor because he thought it would be misunderstood. VM does not know whether CS Lewis would have wanted the letter published.] It is receiving attention now because somebody with nothing better to do pursued a freedom of information lawsuit to get the names of everyone who ever turned a royal honor down. A good constitutional royalist, Lewis would have agreed with Walter Bagehot:

…secrecy is, however, essential to the utility of English royalty as it now is. Above all things our royalty is to be reverenced, and if you begin to poke about it you cannot reverence it. When there is a select committee on the Queen, the charm of royalty will be gone. Its mystery is its life. We must not let in daylight upon magic. We must not bring the Queen into the combat of politics, or she will cease to be reverenced by all combatants; she will become one combatant among many.

Bagehot wrote in a time when there was no freedom of information act, and royal secrets could be kept without offense.  How the British monarchy will survive in an age without secrets, in an age when laws require that all magic be bathed in full daylight remains to be seen.

7 Comments
ESSAY

Indiana, Meet Wisconsin

Earlier this month, reports that Indiana was gearing up for a fight between conservative politicians and organized labors brought echoes of Scott Walker’s Wisconsin to mind. The comparison has just become even more apt—the New York Times reports that Democrats opposing the right-to-work bill have decided to defeat it the only way they can—by refusing to show up for the vote.

Since the measure is all-but guaranteed to pass in a vote, Indiana’s Democrats, like those of Wisconsin before them, have to fall back on stalling tactics like this, although they have not yet seen fit to flee the state.

Labor’s fundamental problems, however, aren’t political.  They are economic.  In the private sector, labor unions can’t protect workers against automation or against foreign competition and over time workers have gradually drifted away from the labor movement.  In the public sector, until very recently the economic issues weren’t real and organized labor was able to push for higher wages, more job security and better fringe benefits.

Now more and more states have hit a financial wall, and even many Democratic cities and states are pushing back against labor demands.  When there isn’t any money, the union can’t get you more. Should public sector unions lose the ability to bring workers the benefits and pay increases they (very naturally and understandably want), the public sector union movement will face the generational decline that private sector unions now see.

For fifty years labor has been wielding its political clout in Washington and the states, and for fifty years the percentage of workers in unions has been falling. In the last few years the center of gravity in the labor movement and the center of the economic crisis has shifted from the private to the public sector. Otherwise, nothing much has changed.

6 Comments