mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn bayles
Germans Re-Thinking "Turn" to Green Energy

wind turbine

In the wake of the Fukushima disaster in Japan, the German government made the much-heralded decision to close all the country’s nuclear reactors as part of its Energiewende, or “energy revolution.” The “revolution” also included government mandates and massive subsidies for renewable energy.

While Germans gleefully embraced the “Nuclear Power? No Thanks!” movement and global greens pointed to Germany as the future of the Green Economy, the sheen is starting to come off the German revolution. The last few months have been a slaughter for the German solar energy. Amid talk of a trade war with China over cheap imported solar panels, the giant German engineering firm Siemens shuttered its solar division after hemorrhaging more than a billion dollars in just two years.

Now Forbes reports that the rest of the German solar industry isn’t following far behind: two of the country’s biggest solar firms, Conenergy and Gehrlicher Solar, both filed for insolvency last week. Another engineering titan, Bosch, has also decided to get out of the solar market.

Meanwhile, the country’s other major green energy project—off-shore windfarms in the Baltic and North Sea—is also threatening to turn into a boondoggle. The massive projects off the northern coast of Germany are supposed to supply 9% of the country’s energy needs by 2023 and were a cornerstone of the government’s plan to abandon nuclear power. Yet engineering challenges, uncertainty around future energy prices and NIMBYs who object to overhead high-tension wires passing through their neighborhoods all threaten to make the project a dangerous white elephant. According to the Economist:

Investors have gone cool on building windmills in German waters because of their costs and doubts over future electricity rates. A study, commissioned from an independent consultant by TenneT, reckons that less than 6GW of the planned 14GW of turbines are likely to be built by 2023. If so, laments VZBV, a consumer body, Germans will end up paying heavily for a lot of useless transmission gear out at sea.

All of these developments have the German public and their elected representatives seriously reconsidering the wisdom of their “revolution.” German consumers haven’t been happy with their skyrocketing energy rates, while German industries have struggled to remain competitive while paying much more for electricity than overseas competition. As green jobs have been disappearing in Germany—employment in the solar sector fell to 87,000 in 2012 from 110,900 a year earlier—German leaders have slashed many of its flagship green programs. Now German Environment Minister Peter Altmaier, a member of Chancellor Merkel’s Christian Democratic party, is saying that the country will end solar subsidies by the year 2018.

The wheels are falling off of Germany’s green energy bandwagon. Many greens saw Berlin’s efforts as a sign of things to come; this reversal of momentum should be instructive.

[Wind turbine image courtesy of Shutterstock]

Features Icon
show comments
  • Atanu Maulik

    I often wonder what is it in German culture which leads to such episodic fits of collective insanity ?

    • bigfire

      Don’t be too righteous. The current green renewable trend is everywhere, even here.

      • Fred_Z

        Yeah, but the Germans don’t give up stupidity until the Red Army is in Berlin.

      • Atanu Maulik

        In case you haven’t noticed, a shale revolution is sweeping US, providing a tremendous boost to its economy. Majority of Americans somehow always manage to remain sane.

  • mathjoseph

    Any trend away from economically unsound (and therefore inherently wasteful) renewable energy schemes is a positive thing. Sustainable energy is obviously not a bad thing in itself; it’s the perversion of economic incentives involved in top-down centralized implementation that does the real damage. Let’s hope the awakening continues. The near-term future of civilization-scale energy generation is to be found in new, safer, more efficient nuclear fission reactor designs, such as the LFTR (liquid fluoride thorium reactor) developed in the 60s and 70s at Oak Ridge but mothballed by Nixon.

  • Kimmy84

    “In the wake of the Fukushima disaster in Japan”

    Huh? Disaster?

    Did something else happen with those reactors I didn’t hear about? Someone finally die?


  • Some questions:

    1) What’s taking up the slack since the post-Fukushima shutdown of the 8 oldest nuclear plants?

    2) Is there an actual decline in power production in Germany?

    3) Are they importing more power?

    4) Any estimates on increases in the rate of conservation as prices have gone up?

    5) German photovoltaic companies may be in trouble, but that doesn’t necessarily impact deployment of PVs manufactured elsewhere. Any numbers on how German deployment rates are changing?

    6) Your previous post showed how European OECD electricity rates had increased. Best I can tell, Germany’s prices are increasing at about the average rate for OECD Europe–and there’s more heterogeneity in prices than I would have thought in so fungible a market. How do you square this with your assertion that green policy is causing prices to rise?

  • mosered

    Siemens = Solyndra: Spoofed in #climate change chapter of:

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service