mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn bayles
Senate Poised to Ruin Obama’s Treaty Party

The United Nations yesterday approved the first ever global arms trade treaty in an effort to regulate the multibillion-dollar international weapons trade. The treaty is supposed curb the ability of countries like Iran and Russia to sell weapons to countries like Syria, though implementation of the agreement is still years away and no actual enforcement system has been drawn up. As of now, the treaty’s only real effect is enabling some countries to flag other countries’ weapons sales as illegal under international law.

President Obama has backed this treaty, but for the US to actually become a party at least 67 Senators will have to get on board. And as we’ve noted before, this is a long shot. Over half the Senate has already signed an amendment pledging to defeat the treaty, citing concerns about ceding authority over US interests to foreign governments. And while the treaty does not grant the UN jurisdiction over any domestic sales, the NRA has also been active in stirring up opposition, capitalizing on the parallels with gun control measures at home.

President Obama may come to regret pushing for a global treaty that has little hope of passing the Senate. Insofar as he believes that this is an important cause, he should have worked on lining up some Jacksonian support in Congress ahead of time.

If the treaty fails, it will join the likes of the Law of the Sea and the Kyoto Protocol in the Senate graveyard. And for any greens reading this, this would likely be the fate of any new global warming treaty as well. The Senate has a long tradition of defeating global cooperation agreements, and it’s one it appears happy to continue.

[Image of Congress courtesy of]

Features Icon
show comments
  • PennyRobinsonFanClub

    Shameful for this to have ANY support in the Senate.

    • ojfl

      Is that not surprising Penny? But judging by the new push for gun control in the Senate, not really unexpected.

  • A pattern is set since the failed Blair House summit. The President asks what the opposition will need to pass a bill then does enough to make it unpalatable.

  • Another_Lurker

    The Senate’s Advise and Consent authority is checking an overreaching President. If Obama truly cared he would have been working with leaders in both parties to find a workable solution or drop out of the negotiations. It is deliberate Constitutional check on Presidential stupidity.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service