<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT: A River Still Runs Through It — of Denial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/</link>
	<description>Walter Russell Mead&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Con  Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>Con  Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>The rigors of scientific discipline demand,inter alia,that a theory imply the kind of evidence that would prove it wrong.Predictions based on the theory are checked against the facts.If something occurs that should not have,and vice versa,the theory is discarded.The principal AGW alarmists themselves lament that they cannot explain the lack of warming.Ergo the AGW theory has been discredited.Einstein said that it would not take 100 scientists to prove him wrong.One fact alone would suffice.The defeat of the Emissions Trading Scheme in the Australian Parliament clearly demonstrates that the public has had enough of the lies,cheating,filibuster,spin and obfuscation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rigors of scientific discipline demand,inter alia,that a theory imply the kind of evidence that would prove it wrong.Predictions based on the theory are checked against the facts.If something occurs that should not have,and vice versa,the theory is discarded.The principal AGW alarmists themselves lament that they cannot explain the lack of warming.Ergo the AGW theory has been discredited.Einstein said that it would not take 100 scientists to prove him wrong.One fact alone would suffice.The defeat of the Emissions Trading Scheme in the Australian Parliament clearly demonstrates that the public has had enough of the lies,cheating,filibuster,spin and obfuscation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>Orson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>I gave up on reading the NYT in 1999 - when Clinton&#039;s impeachment was all about the nasty Republican&#039;s moralistic aversion to sex, and yet the Bill of Impeachment never mentioned &#039;sex&#039;.

As the old Soviet era joke went (and WRM remembers better than I), there is no Pravda in Isvestia (sp?), no Isvestia in Pavda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up on reading the NYT in 1999 &#8211; when Clinton&#8217;s impeachment was all about the nasty Republican&#8217;s moralistic aversion to sex, and yet the Bill of Impeachment never mentioned &#8216;sex&#8217;.</p>
<p>As the old Soviet era joke went (and WRM remembers better than I), there is no Pravda in Isvestia (sp?), no Isvestia in Pavda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Blankenship</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Blankenship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>Suprised by no mention of the global warming mess in the NYT?  None can be found for the past couple of days in the always relevant 
Huffington Post. Tallk about boycotts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suprised by no mention of the global warming mess in the NYT?  None can be found for the past couple of days in the always relevant<br />
Huffington Post. Tallk about boycotts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Blake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>John Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>Not since the early 1980s have U.S. print or TV mass media dealt honestly with substantive issues of the day.  &quot;Bias&quot; is far too mild a term.  Censorship, propaganda, skewed ideological agendas invariably promoting a crypto-fascist Corporate Statism are their stock-in-trade.  No-one of decency or common sense, neither a conceited elitist nor a peculating special-interest rentier, has any business crediting these bumwads with any objective rationality whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not since the early 1980s have U.S. print or TV mass media dealt honestly with substantive issues of the day.  &#8220;Bias&#8221; is far too mild a term.  Censorship, propaganda, skewed ideological agendas invariably promoting a crypto-fascist Corporate Statism are their stock-in-trade.  No-one of decency or common sense, neither a conceited elitist nor a peculating special-interest rentier, has any business crediting these bumwads with any objective rationality whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>Clearly, reading the NYT leaves you less informed.

Propaganda always does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, reading the NYT leaves you less informed.</p>
<p>Propaganda always does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>kcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>Jimpithecus, I hopped on over to your link and checked it out but are you sure you&#039;re not jumping to the conclusion that the NY Times hasn&#039;t broken some startling new development in the story of a 70 million year old frog.  Personally I find the whole topic ribbeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimpithecus, I hopped on over to your link and checked it out but are you sure you&#8217;re not jumping to the conclusion that the NY Times hasn&#8217;t broken some startling new development in the story of a 70 million year old frog.  Personally I find the whole topic ribbeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGeezer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>The descent into irrelevance continues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The descent into irrelevance continues&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimpithecus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimpithecus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty funny, since the frog story originally ran in February of 2008 and was covered by the BBC.  It can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7251666.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty funny, since the frog story originally ran in February of 2008 and was covered by the BBC.  It can be found <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7251666.stm" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5th Level Fighter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>5th Level Fighter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>&quot;The cascading difficulties of both the IPCC and the East Anglia CRU?&quot;

Not to mention NASA&#039;s involvement in the manipulation of data.  Though, they were actually rewarded for their part in the fraud with a budget increase of hundreds of millions of dollars, specifically to study &quot;global warming.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The cascading difficulties of both the IPCC and the East Anglia CRU?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not to mention NASA&#8217;s involvement in the manipulation of data.  Though, they were actually rewarded for their part in the fraud with a budget increase of hundreds of millions of dollars, specifically to study &#8220;global warming.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CosmicConservative</title>
		<link>http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/16/nyt-a-river-still-runs-through-it-of-denial/#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator>CosmicConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/?p=2801#comment-2107</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. Walter, did they by chance have a story on how the sea levels were higher by a meter 60,000 years ago or so when CO2 levels were much lower than today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. Walter, did they by chance have a story on how the sea levels were higher by a meter 60,000 years ago or so when CO2 levels were much lower than today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

