Comments on: IPCC Head in Glaciergate Crime?

By: Pickerhead :: Pickings from the Webvine ::January 26, 2010

Pickerhead :: Pickings from the Webvine ::January 26, 2010 — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:15:23 +0000

[...] Walter Russell Meade, in The American Interest, gives more reason to pull the plug on UN funding. The London Times continues to follow the glaciergate story–and it keeps getting worse. [...]

By: John Vidal | Scot Network

John Vidal | Scot Network — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:56:18 +0000

[...] waiting for retractions or the evidence of any inquiries or investigations, leading western environmentalists and other commentators shamefully rushed in to say he should resign. And now, following the InterAcademy Council (IAC) [...]

By: If Rajendra Pachauri goes, who on Earth would want to be IPCC chair? | John Vidal | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:43:48 +0000

[...] interests.Without waiting for retractions or the evidence of any inquiries or investigations, leading western environmentalists and other commentators shamefully rushed in to say he should resign. And now, following the InterAcademy Council (IAC) [...]

By: Arterneknirty

Arterneknirty — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:53:43 +0000

This is a great site man. Thanks. Hey when is the next update?

By: Robert Gallant

Robert Gallant — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:31:30 +0000

Why did all these so called expert scientific educators accept the climate change as a truth before they checked all the possible theories of globeal change. Look at all the waste of time,money,worry that these so-called experts caused. Al Gore should be told to return his Nobel Prize as he is undeserving of such a honor

By: Con Michael

Con Michael — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:29:14 +0000

The rigors of scientific discipline demand,inter alia,that a theory or hypothesis imply the kind of evidence that would prove it wrong.Predictions based on the theory are checked against the facts.If something occurs that should not have,and vice versa,the theory is discarded.The principal AGW alarmists themselves lament that they cannot explain the lack of warming.Ergo the AGW theory has been disproved.This does not deter socalled experts from touting the widespread subzero conditions as evidence of global warming.The comprehensive defeat ot the Emissions Trading Scheme in the Australian Parliament clearly demonstrates that the public has had enough of the lies,cheating,filibuster,spin and obfuscation.

By: jim

jim — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:52:08 +0000

Algore needs to be leading the charge???

The history of liberal liars suggests that Algore will double down on the lies and ratchet up the demonization of global-warming critics. Well, yes, a few small mistakes are to expected in something so complex, but that does not repudiate the overwhelming evidence that blah, blah, blah.

By: Maggie's Farm

Maggie's Farm — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:25:22 +0000

Thursday afternoon links…

What was never mentioned in the SOTU? National security.
How Mann and Jones hid the decline. They just abruptly eliminated all of the cooler weather stations.
Why Medicare is terrible for docs and hospitals. Dr. Bob
IPCC Head in Glaciergate Cri…

By: British Government Says Climategate Coverup Violated UK Law - Walter Russell Mead's Blog - The American Interest

Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:36:18 +0000

[...] Posted on January 28th, 2010 British Government Says Climategate Coverup Violated UK Law The Great Meltdown continues; the London Times reports that British government official responsible for monitoring [...]

By: Cap And Trade: The New Health Care? - Walter Russell Mead's Blog - The American Interest

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:46:51 +0000

[...] IPCC predictions of their imminent demise, the Himalayan glaciers are actually doing well. In a scandal potentially far more damaging than the release of injudiciously worded emails from prominent [...]