Marie Antoinette in Karachi Posted In: General

The Pakistani glitterati turned out in force for this fashion show featuring daring outfits by local designers.

At one level, you have to wish them well.  People and especially women-people should have the right to wear what they want, and encouraging local designers is a good way to help Pakistan’s textile industry move higher up the food chain, producing better goods that can sell for higher prices and provide more jobs for more people.

But there’s also something creepy about this flaunting of community values and mores.  Pakistan is an economically polarized society; a tiny, mostly westernized minority lives very well and prides itself on its cultural and moral superiority to the great unwashed masses.

In Roman times, local rulers like King Herod used to observe those tiresome Jewish laws in public, but in private modeled their lifestyles on the rich and the decadent of Rome.  Was that really a good thing?

Americans often get fooled.  In a lot of the world, tiny and wealthy elites clinging to privilege and power often adopt American styles and, at least verbally, American-sounding values as a badge of class privilege and social prestige.  They look like us and they sound like us, but their agenda could not be more different from the profoundly democratic approach to life that informs American society in so many ways.

Unfortunately, we aren’t the only people who get confused.  Millions of people in Pakistan despise this cultivated, internationalized elite as a gang of corrupt and oppressive tyrants.  That their oppressors wrap themselves in American values and American fashions doesn’t do us any good at all.


2 Comments »

It’s important to keep all this in mind as we try to evaluate what Matthew Hoh, the State Department official who resigned recently, said about Afghanistan.

Throughout the 20th century, Afghanistan’s history has been one of fitful modernizations and liberalizations spearheaded by Westernized elites which have met with varying degrees of pushback, often quite violent, from the rural conservative population. The CIA World Factbook lists Afghanistan’s urban population to be 24% from a 2008 survey. What Hoh is saying is that while we think we’re fighting an unholy alliance of Al Qaeda and the Taliban, what we’re really fighting is the conservative Pashtun resistance to a modern, centralizing, Westernized minority.

We may find the rural Afghan traditions to be harsh and incomprehensible, especially their attitudes towards women. But are we really helping the long-term situation by fighting on the side of the people who are considered alien to their own countrymen for the very values they espouse? It would seem that the only way for long-term stability to arise in Afghanistan is if the rural hinterland is very slowly, gradually, and gingerly brought into modernity by rural Pashtuns themselves.

Comment by Damir Marusic – November 7, 2009 @ 3:33 pm


[...] by insisting that the Afghans adopt our modern, emancipated approach. Walter Russell Mead wrote a penetrating post on this conundrum as it pertains to Pakistan a few weeks back on his blog at The American Interest [...]

Pingback by the new contrarian - The Speech – December 2, 2009 @ 1:51 pm


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a comment

From the March/April 2010 issue

Behind the Settlements

West Bank settlements hollow out respect for the law in the State of Israel.

Are the Settlements Illegal?

Answering that question is a pitfall the Obama Administration has been wise to avoid.

Allies Divided

Israel and America have long taken opposite approaches to managing Palestinians and other Arabs.

The Outpatient Prison

How to lower both the prison population and crime—at the same time.

Follow us:      
BOOKS BY WALTER RUSSELL MEAD

Click to buy through Amazon.com