Dear Fukuyama :

Much pleased to exchange letter of information with you.
For more than 10 years,I have enjoyed reading and talking of “war” with my colleague in same campus, from reading America’s Self-Defeating Hegemony last October
I am prof.of philosophy,now semi-official commentator for K.T.Your article(10/21) of “korea as a model for
Iraq” will be a catalyst for topic to be discussed with you. Your telling critical argument for withdrawl of U.S.
armies from Iraq and Korea is very timely for watching my eye for a few days,because it give me a variety of interpretation for changeable situation world-wide.it sounds good,but there is a catch here.

Your assumption of 1000 words essay is realistic review of world affairs,but real term of realism in foreign
affairs is changing from time to time;space to space.You are one of authors in that field.40 years ago,Dr.
Kissinger started to dispatch ping-pong team across pacific ocean to get in touch with Red China.After
exchanging a few playful games,he got little bear from China,which was expanded to cultural service,
finally exchanging political diplomat between two countries.
If american armies are leaving Bagdad at instant basis as you are suggesting,how long do you suppose
they can enjoy vacancy of military power? Not permanent time as long as 50 years? It will be instantly replaced
by another group under name of friendly protection.Who will keep princeling of Dubai or Emritus from being
kidnaped by sea-thief? They are planning to build up sky-rocketing recreation center.Tourist should be informed
of going abroad and backwards.The windfalls have some important upsides for oil-producing nations and the world at large.Saudi Arabia’s oil revenues have surged from $60 billion in 2000 to an estimated $152 billion in 2007.
Unhappily to say,it has hindered democracy or capitalism.Government with large oil recepts need less consent
from the government to stay in power.They can reward their friends and buy off their opposition,or pay to have it
crushed.There is a war;where is oil dollar.Thank you for suggesting sub-text for discussion with my student.

From H.J.KIM.(prof.of philosophy)
Chonbuk national University.korea

Comment by Hee-Jun Kim – November 12, 2007 @ 3:31 am

Dear Fukuyama :

Much pleased to exchange letter of information with you.
For more than 10 years,I have enjoyed reading and talking of “war” with my colleague in same campus, from reading America’s Self-Defeating Hegemony last October
I am prof.of philosophy,now semi-official commentator for K.T.Your article(10/21) of “korea as a model for
Iraq” will be a catalyst for topic to be discussed with you. Your telling critical argument for withdrawl of U.S.
armies from Iraq and Korea is very timely for watching my eye for a few days,because it give me a variety of interpretation for changeable situation world-wide.it sounds good,but there is a catch here.

Your assumption of 1000 words essay is realistic review of world affairs,but real term of realism in foreign
affairs is changing from time to time;space to space.You are one of authors in that field.40 years ago,Dr.
Kissinger started to dispatch ping-pong team across pacific ocean to get in touch with Red China.After
exchanging a few playful games,he got little bear from China,which was expanded to cultural service,
finally exchanging political diplomat between two countries.
If american armies are leaving Bagdad at instant basis as you are suggesting,how long do you suppose
they can enjoy vacancy of military power? Not permanent time as long as 50 years? It will be instantly replaced
by another group under name of friendly protection.Who will keep princeling of Dubai or Emritus from being
kidnaped by sea-thief? They are planning to build up sky-rocketing recreation center.Tourist should be informed
of going abroad and backwards.The windfalls have some important upsides for oil-producing nations and the world at large.Saudi Arabia’s oil revenues have surged from $60 billion in 2000 to an estimated $152 billion in 2007.
Unhappily to say,it has hindered democracy or capitalism.Government with large oil recepts need less consent
from the government to stay in power.They can reward their friends and buy off their opposition,or pay to have it
crushed.There is a war;where is oil dollar.Thank you for suggesting sub-text for discussion with my student.

From H.J.KIM.(prof.of philosophy)
Chonbuk national University.korea

Comment by Hee-Jun Kim – November 12, 2007 @ 3:33 am

Dear Fukuyama :

Much pleased to exchange letter of information with you.For more than 10 years,I have enjoyed reading and talking of “war” with my colleague in same campus, from reading America’s Self-Defeating Hegemony last October
I am prof.of philosophy,now semi-official commentator for K.T.Your article(10/21) of “korea as a model for Iraq” will be a catalyst for topic to be discussed with you. Your telling critical argument for withdrawl of U.S. armies from Iraq and Korea is very timely for watching my eye for a few
days,because it give me a variety of interpretation for changeable situation world-wide.it sounds good,but there is a catch here.

Your assumption of 1000 words essay is realistic review of world affairs,but real term of realism in foreign affairs is changing from time to time;space to space.You are one of authors in that field.40 years ago,Dr. Kissinger started to dispatch ping-pong team across pacific ocean to get in touch with Red China.After
exchanging a few playful games,he got little bear from China,which was expanded to cultural service, finally exchanging political diplomat between two countries.
If american armies are leaving Bagdad at instant basis as you are suggesting,how long do you suppose they can enjoy vacancy of military power? Not permanent time as long as 50 years? It will be instantly replaced
by another group under name of friendly protection.Who will keep princeling of Dubai or Emritus from being kidnaped by sea-thief? They are planning to build up sky-rocketing recreation center.Tourist should be informed
of going abroad and backwards.The windfalls have some important upsides for oil-producing nations and the world at large.
Saudi Arabia’s oil revenues have surged from $60 billion in 2000 to an estimated $152 billion in 2007.
Unhappily to say,it has hindered democracy or capitalism.Government with large oil recepts need less consent from the government to stay in power.They can reward their friends and buy off their opposition,or pay to have it
crushed.There is a war;where is oil dollar.Thank you for suggesting sub-text for discussion with my student.

From H.J.KIM.(prof.of philosophy)
Chonbuk national University.korea

Comment by Hee-Jun Kim – November 12, 2007 @ 3:35 am

Dear Francis Fukuyama

I’m Justin Ambarita, student of Communication Bina Nusantara University semester two. I’m very interest with your book about built a strength of the state. In that book so many things that i can learn how to propagate the development of the state.
I can understand how to review the concept of the state and discuss about issues caused by the weakness of the state including domestic and international issues.as your admirer, i hope u can respon my email. and with my pleasure i want to ask some question: how the wise government to make them realise about the coruption that can destroyed the state which is can caused the weakness and poorness in that state..That is the biggest problem in our state. Hope you please reply me email, thanx and wallways be sukses. GBU

Comment by Jusrin Ucok Ambarita – June 1, 2008 @ 8:48 am

Dear Mr. Fukuyama,,
i want ask you about this:

what is conection between matter and idea??
thanks

Comment by Nugrah Dea Anindita – June 1, 2008 @ 9:21 am