This is a link to the presentation I gave to a plenary panel “The Clash of Cultures and American Hegemony” (this wasn’t my title) at the American Political Science Association annual meeting in Philadelphia on Sept. 1. Sam Huntington was supposed to be on the panel but was not able to participate; other panelists were Ben Barber (Univ. of Maryland), Steve Walt (Harvard), and Jim Kurth (Swarthmore).
-
Archives
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- April 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- April 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
-
Meta

Undoubtedly many adminstrative errors in application of theory have led to failures in such areas as the mid-east. Yet, rather than conceding that the administration had a coherent theory of international relations from which its policies eminated, i argued in my bachelors thesis that 2002 national security strategy, taken as a comperhensive representation of a theoretical base, lacked such coherence and was flawed by serious internal contradictions. As such, it employed principles from both the realist and the liberal internationalist tradition. It did not resolve the seemingly mutaully exclusive propositions from either side.
In short, the adminstration’s policy failures emerged from its contradictory theoretical base. As you stated in The End of History, while balance of power politics may have little relevance among post-historical states as a tool of statecraft, realism retained its relevance in dealing with the historical world. I think its safe to say that the adminstrations failures have stemmed from its failure to ackowledge the persistant relevance of realist theory in the 21st century, as well as its failure to comprehend possible social, economic or historical preconditions for democracy.